HomeBreaking NewsPNP Slams Briceño Administration Over Ombudsman Contract Decision

PNP Slams Briceño Administration Over Ombudsman Contract Decision

PNP Slams Briceño Administration Over Ombudsman Contract Decision

PNP Slams Briceño Administration Over Ombudsman Contract Decision

The People’s National Party (PNP) has condemned the government’s handling of Ombudsman Gilbert Swazo, calling the decision not to renew his contract an attack on transparency and independent oversight.

In a letter, the PNP said it has “serious concern” over the letter sent to Swazo on Christmas Eve, indicating his contract would end. The party questioned the timing, noting that it came while the ombudsman is involved in a major Freedom of Information appeal.

Swazo recently ruled that parts of the government’s legal fee records in the redistricting case should be made public under the Freedom of Information Act. The government is now challenging that ruling in court. According to the PNP, this creates the appearance that Swazo is being punished for defending the “public’s right to know”.

Swazo told News Five, “Of course I am. I am surprised. However, let me state that the reengagement is the prerogative of National Assembly and certainly they have come to a decision that my tenure as ombudsman, based on the letter, will not be renewed.” 

PNP praised Swazo’s record, noting that he has earned broad respect and is “among the most popular ombudsmen since independence.” In its statement, the PNP said, “He had overwhelming public support, which definitely means he was doing a good job in the interest of the people of Belize.”

“We are disappointed that this PUP administration has decided not to renew the ombudsman contract,” the release stated. The PNP is calling on the government to withdraw the letter and renew Swazo’s contract, saying this would be “in the best interest of Belize.”

Leader of the Opposition Tracy Panton also expressed disappointment over the decision. “I am disappointed,” she said. “I think there is no excuse why this matter was not brought before the National Assembly for consideration, discussion, and debate.”

Facebook Comments

Share With: