Feinstein Fails to Reopen Stake Bank Appeal Case with New Report  

The Court of Appeal has dealt a blow to businessman Michael Feinstein in his ongoing legal fight over the Stake Bank Extension. In a decision delivered last week, the court rejected Feinstein’s request to introduce new evidence and denied his bid for further document disclosure, clearing a major procedural hurdle for the government. Feinstein had asked the court to consider a tourism consultant’s report that compared cruise port options in Belize, arguing it could show the government wrongly justified the compulsory acquisition of his land. But the judges weren’t convinced. The court ruled that Feinstein could have obtained the report earlier if he had acted with reasonable diligence and said the document would not have changed the outcome of the original case anyway. The judges also stressed that appeals are not a second chance to rebuild a case with evidence that wasn’t presented at trial. On top of that, the court refused to order the government to hand over additional documents, calling the request unnecessary and not in the interest of justice at this stage. The ruling means the appeal will move forward without the new evidence, and Feinstein has been ordered to pay legal costs to the government and other parties involved. This decision keeps the focus squarely on whether the original judgment, upholding the compulsory acquisition of land for the Stake Bank cruise port project, was legally sound, based only on the evidence already on record. We’ll continue to follow this case as the substantive appeal heads toward full hearing.

 

Attention readers: This online newscast is a direct transcript of our evening television broadcast. When speakers use Kriol, we have carefully rendered their words using a standard spelling system.

 

Watch the full newscast here: